Greg, with a helping from feminized libertine logic, merely swaps a word in to deflect. His pretense of 'knowingness' is the same empty verbal gymnastics I expect from the left feminist archives: "Different ways of knowing." It is postmodernist praxis to swap out words or equivocate on their meaning. Knowledge, in this feminized logically-libertine cul de sac, is something one proclaims, but not something that can be shared. This is such a weak, feminized, anti-science superstition wrapped up in a trite pink bow. Greg has quite a progressive left feminized relativist habit of proclaiming his discussion partners of belonging to the devil's party. Not for him the robust masculine knowledge that has been tested, tempered, and found strongly in accordance with reality. No, he prefers a solipsist inner wind of feminized superego. Why does he so easily fall into the female thought pattern of needing a spirit? Perhaps equivocating on knowledge, aping a feminist historian of science such as Sandra Harding, he can subtly position himself as an expert guide to the ineffable. All anti-rational bullshit, all with the same end. Anti-knowledge, anti-Man, anti-reason. Such a soft, weak, limpwristed, feminized passive travesty of hard-won knowledge. . Bravo. I see you even know your Fay Weldon.. As philosophical in her way as AR, more prolific and much more entertaining. You write what I knew I knew but too hazily and lazily . Ah, still Just My Bill. la Vache qui Rit