caroljane Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 This is for 9thDoc and anyone who could use a lightener on this day of desolating news.Favourite Oonline poster of mine and ND's, Knucklehead Nicky, has laid down the law on marriage.It is immoral, he says, to become dependent on your spouse as a source of income, unless you are raising children.I would not like to be the Knuck when DrMrsDr hears about this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
9thdoctor Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 I customarily ignore him, and avoid engaging him, even when it's such an easy shot. Is this the post you have in mind?http://forum.objectivismonline.com/index.php?showtopic=23856entry297188There's nothing to be gained by arguing with him. When he attacks something I've just written, I try to shoo him away while expending as little effort as possible. Otherwise, it's one for Stanislaw Lec: "Cavorting with dwarves ruins your backbone".No, not these guys! They're dwarfs, keep it straight!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FxYfb8XGukOh, alright, if Grumpy mated with Dopey, yeah, the result would be something like Knucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted September 12, 2012 Author Share Posted September 12, 2012 lol. One assumes Knucky, since the moral is the practical, has not yet accumulated any wifes or ex-wifes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted September 13, 2012 Author Share Posted September 13, 2012 ND, you must be crushed since Prof. Knucky has set you straight on the DIM Hypothesis, We don't need to wait for Robert's review now. The Knuck's insightful commentary tells us pore folk who doesn't think as good as Dr. Peikoff, like anybody could, everything we need to know.DIM for Dummies as it were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
9thdoctor Posted September 13, 2012 Share Posted September 13, 2012 ND, you must be crushed since Prof. Knucky has set you straight on the DIM Hypothesis,Huh? He’s gone after Dennis Hardin, not me. I haven’t had much to say about DIM, since I haven’t read it.http://forum.objectivismonline.com/index.php?showtopic=23364entry297215 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted September 13, 2012 Author Share Posted September 13, 2012 ND, you must be crushed since Prof. Knucky has set you straight on the DIM Hypothesis,Huh? He's gone after Dennis Hardin, not me. I haven't had much to say about DIM, since I haven't read it.http://forum.objecti...64Sorry for the mixup, Dennis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now