Dglgmut Posted June 16, 2013 Share Posted June 16, 2013 But if the person who slipped was immoral, laughter would be not only appropriate, it would be moral.Actually, Michael, this is covered in the book. This is one of the socio-evolutionary functions of humor--to help weirdos correct their behavior and fit in.The theory the authors try to advance is the incongruity (resolution) theory, which can even explain why a high-status person slipping on a banana peel makes us laugh. Contrary to Rand's opinion, it is not only uncontrollable, but you could rightfully call it moral. The reason being that you've just corrected a belief about the world ("check your premises"--laughter can be the reward for doing so). If they take themselves seriously, and we believe them, then their slip on the banana peel instantly corrects our (working-memory) belief about them, about human beings, and/or about ourselves as a human being. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginny Posted June 16, 2013 Share Posted June 16, 2013 Adam/Ginny, this is amazing. I thought my own recollections may have been biased or distorted by time - but do you remember Phil's story of his "therapy\" and his overthinking of his girlfriend's slightest word, while just getting up and leaving after sex without even a backward look? I am glad Ottawa was so far from NY, and though often invited the bf never wanted to go there! It is hard not to think that an unintended consequence of ardent Objectivism was a lot of sexual problems for otherwise normal healthy young men.I think Ginny and I should put this to a test.What freaken test?Carol, yes, I remember the post from poor Phil. There has to be something about Obj. that screws men up in this area. Could that with all the importance Rand put on sex, including that your choice of a partner reveals all of your dark secrets, be a bit much to handle?Some of this nonsense is still going on. There a guy on OO who has a blog called The Leading Man. It's an dating advice column for guys. Rand's superior man raises his ugly head again. This blog is full of stuff how only men make decisions, only men determine what happens in a relationship, and a woman who opens her mouth is emasculating men. Jeez, how much does it take to emasculate a superior man?. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 Adam/Ginny, this is amazing. I thought my own recollections may have been biased or distorted by time - but do you remember Phil's story of his "therapy\" and his overthinking of his girlfriend's slightest word, while just getting up and leaving after sex without even a backward look? I am glad Ottawa was so far from NY, and though often invited the bf never wanted to go there! It is hard not to think that an unintended consequence of ardent Objectivism was a lot of sexual problems for otherwise normal healthy young men.I think Ginny and I should put this to a test.What freaken test?Carol, yes, I remember the post from poor Phil. There has to be something about Obj. that screws men up in this area. Could that with all the importance Rand put on sex, including that your choice of a partner reveals all of your dark secrets, be a bit much to handle?Some of this nonsense is still going on. There a guy on OO who has a blog called The Leading Man. It's an dating advice column for guys. Rand's superior man raises his ugly head again. This blog is full of stuff how only men make decisions, only men determine what happens in a relationship, and a woman who opens her mouth is emasculating men. Jeez, how much does it take to emasculate a superior man?.An early victim was Barbara Branden herself. In PAR she makes it quite clear that although likeminded with NB and greatly admiring him, she never felt the sexual attraction for him that centres a marriage, and of course no amount of her self-blaming and efficient thinking and Rand's pronouncements could make her feel it. The body does not lie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted June 17, 2013 Author Share Posted June 17, 2013 For those interested in Dennett's book and his theories, here is a lecture he gave on June 20, 2011 at Bucharest University: (cont...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted June 17, 2013 Author Share Posted June 17, 2013 (... cont.) Agree or disagree, in whole or in part, it's great food for thought.My copy of the book has shipped, so I will be receiving it soon.Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now